
Before taking Valerie Boyd’s critical writing class, I’d never given much thought to what it means to be a critic and how much goes into those reviews that we all love to hate when they go against our opinions and enjoy reading when we agree. I suppose I’d always just imagined that critics watched movies or ate at restaurants or what have you, and then wrote about what they thought. End of story. After a semester spent learning about the art of the review, however, I’ve learned that being a critic means so much more.
It’s not enough to simply listen to a CD and decide if you like it or not. Critics have to be good reporters and strong writers as well, must be able to dig up relevant background information and to bring alive for readers something that they may not yet have experienced, or perhaps never will. A good reviewer will tell their readers everything they need to know while simultaneously making them drool over delectable-sounding dishes or hear in their heads music that they’ve never heard with their ears.
A critic’s job, I’ve found, is not to force his opinions on his readers, but rather to fearlessly offer his thoughts and to provide the readers with the tools they needs to decide if the movie or book or restaurant is worth experiencing. Critics exist today, at least in part, to help us sift through the mass amounts of media to decide what’s really worth spending time and money on, and what isn’t.
Thus, in short, the role of the critic is to entertain, to inform, and to guide, and as long as we have a seemingly limitless supply of books, movies, television shows, and other media, there will always be a place for the critic in our society.